Share

Campaign Funds for Security

Initiative

About

Vote Mama Foundation is the only organization tracking the authorization and usage of Campaign Funds for Security (CFS) at the federal and state levels.

Amid escalating threats and violence, Campaign Funds for Security (CFS) is a necessary resource that keeps candidates and officeholders safe—at no cost to taxpayers. When political violence deters certain Americans from running for office, our government is unable to fully represent us. CFS prevents candidates and officeholders from having to choose between public service and their personal safety, keeping the door open for all Americans to participate in politics.

Problem

From the assassination of Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, to the targeted killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, political violence continues to be on the rise. It’s a growing problem that threatens to gatekeep who can safely participate in our politics—and it disproportionately excludes the voices that are historically the most underrepresented, including moms.

According to a 2024 Pipeline Fund poll, three out of four moms running for state and local office experienced some form of harassment on the campaign trail. Of those moms, nearly half said that it “negatively affected” their desire to run for office in the future.

Solution

We need more parents in office, and to achieve that, we must provide the tools and protection they need to run and serve safely.

In 2024, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) issued explicit guidance that all federal candidates and officeholders may use campaign funds to pay for security measures, so long as they are addressing ongoing threats or dangers directly related to their public status. Permissible expenses include:

  • Non-structural security devices: such as hardware, locks, alarm systems, motion detectors, and security camera systems
  • Structural security devices: such as wiring, lighting, gates, doors, and fencing, as long as they are intended solely to provide security and not to improve the property or increase its value
  • Professional security personnel
  • Cybersecurity software, devices, and services

At the state level, Vote Mama Foundation research has found that more than 30% of states allow some form of Campaign Funds for Security (CFS).
You can submit an Advisory Opinion request to find out if candidates in your state can use their campaign funds on security expenses directly related to campaign activities and/or carrying out official duties. If not currently allowed, you can ask a member of your state legislature to introduce legislation allowing for CFS.

Access

15 states have authorized Campaign Funds for Security (CFS)—so far.

While CFS is not officially authorized in Colorado, Hawai’i, Illinois, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Washington, candidates in these states have reported using campaign funds on security expenses in their campaign filings. Vote Mama Foundation considers these states to have informally authorized CFS.

State Status Approval Method Year Approved/Used Who is Included? Non-structural security devices Structural security devices Professional security personnel and services Cybersecurity software, devices, and services
Alabama Approved Legislation 2026 Candidates, Officeholders yes no yes yes
Arizona Approved Secretary of State Opinion 2025 Candidates yes yes yes yes
Arkansas Approved Ethics Ruling 2022 Candidates yes no yes no
California Approved Legislation 2020 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes no
Colorado Approved (informal) Reported Usage (not officially approved) yes no yes yes
Georgia Approved Ethics Ruling 2021 Candidates, Officeholders yes no no no
Hawaii Approved (informal) Reported Usage (not officially approved) yes no yes yes
Idaho Approved Secretary of State Opinion 2024 Candidates yes no yes yes
Illinois Approved Legislation 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes no yes
Kentucky Approved Legislation 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
Louisiana Approved Legislation 2002 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
Maryland Approved Ethics Ruling 2019 Candidates no no no yes
Massachusetts Approved Ethics Ruling 2021 Candidates, Officeholders yes no yes no
Michigan Approved Secretary of State Opinion 2021 Officeholders, Candidates yes yes yes yes
Minnesota Approved Legislation 2021 Candidates yes yes yes yes
Nebraska Approved Legislation 2026 Candidates yes yes yes yes
Nevada Approved Legislation 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
New Jersey Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
New Mexico Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Candidates, Legislators yes yes yes yes
New York Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Officeholders, Candidates yes yes yes yes
North Dakota Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes no yes yes
Ohio Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
Oklahoma Approved (informal) Ethics Ruling 2025 Officeholders yes no no yes
Oregon Approved Legislation 2026 Candidates, Officeholders yes no no no
Pennsylvania Approved (informal) Reported Usage (not officially approved) yes no no no
South Carolina Approved (informal) Reported Usage (not officially approved) no no yes no
South Dakota Approved Attorney General Opinion 2026 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes
Tennessee Approved Legislation 2026 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes no no
Texas Approved Ethics Ruling 2021 Judicial Officeholders yes yes no no
Utah Approved Legislation 2026 Candidates, Officeholders yes no yes no
Washington Approved Ethics Ruling 2025 Candidates, Officeholders yes yes yes yes

Usage

From 2014 to 2024, over 800 federal candidates used campaign funds to cover more than $41 million in security expenses. Nearly half of all this spending occurred in the high-intensity election years 2020 and 2024.

This spending reflects broad, bipartisan support for CFS. The increased usage by men, women, Democrats, and Republicans underscores the urgent need for candidates at every level of office to be able to use campaign funds on security expenses to protect themselves and their families.

Federal usage form 2014–2024

$41,228,562.85

total spent on security expenses

864

federal candidates in at least 1,324 races utilized CFS

7,015%

increase in spending from 2014 to 2024

$18,984,045.91

spent by Democrats

$14,755,867.26

spent by Republicans

Top congressional spenders

$2,362,232

Raphael Warnock

$1,606,141

Ted Cruz

$1,414,100

Kyrsten Sinema

$831,978

Cori Bush

$666,958

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Top presidential spenders

$6,839,236

Donald Trump

$5,784,339

Robert Kennedy Jr.

$2,497, 377

Michael Bloomberg

$1,790,508

Kamala Harris

$1,217,855

Bernie Sanders

About the dataset

No. Both moms and dads, Democrats and Republicans, can and do use Campaign Funds for Childcare. We need more parents at every decision-making table to advocate for common-sense policies that help all families nationwide.

Get involved

Get involved

Support our work

Vote Mama Foundation identifies policy solutions to break down the barriers that keep moms out of office and out of power. Your gift today helps to build a country where all women and working families can thrive.